The four accused, who breached the security of Parliament, sprayed colored smoke outside and inside the House.
New Delhi:
Investigations by the police and the committee have intensified in the matter of breach of Parliament security. The court sent all four accused to 7 days police remand. Meanwhile, the mastermind of the case, Lalit Jha, has surrendered. On Thursday, the police produced the four accused in the Patiala House Court. Delhi Police sought 15 days remand, but got 7 days remand from the court. During the hearing, the Delhi Police told the court that pamphlets with the name of PM Narendra Modi were found from these accused. In a pamphlet, these people described the PM as missing.
Also read
During the production of the accused, the Delhi Police told the Patiala House Court that the two people who breached Parliament’s security had pamphlets, which they wanted to give to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Lucknow shoes were also recovered from him. The police claimed that they said the PM was missing in the pamphlet. The police also claimed that the accused had offered a cash reward from a Swiss bank for information related to the PM.
Surrender of mastermind Lalit Jha
Late on Thursday night, Lalit Jha, the mastermind behind the entire case, surrendered at the Darja Path police station. From here he has been handed over to the Special Cell.
All the accused stayed at Vicky Sharma’s house
According to the report, accused Sagar Sharma, Manoranjan D, Neelam Azad and Amol Shinde stayed at Vicky Sharma’s house in Sector 7 Housing Board Colony in Gurugram before leaving for Delhi. Lalit Jha was also with him. Delhi Police says that all these met each other on an online site. All together planned to create a ruckus in Parliament.
UAPA imposed on the accused
The police also told the court that the motive of the accused is still not clear. At the same time, the four accused who opened the smoke cans told the police that they wanted to draw the attention of Parliament and the public to issues like unemployment and caste violence in Manipur. He wanted these issues to be debated in Parliament. All the accused in the case are facing charges under the stringent Anti-Terrorism Act UAPA and several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

